ShopMobileRadio RSSRivals.com Yahoo! Sports


Coffee Shop
Register User Options
Site: Forum:


Post New topic Post New Poll Post Reply    

Previous in Thread | Next in Thread | Back to Topics
Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - SpiveyDore 4/26 9:13 PM (show all)  Views 559
       Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/26 9:26 PM
              Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - ncsan22 4/26 9:36 PM
                     Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - PhilipVU94 4/26 10:55 PM
                            Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - SpiveyDore 4/26 11:03 PM
                                   Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - SpiveyDore 4/26 11:09 PM
                                          Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/27 8:17 AM
                                                 Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - PhilipVU94 4/27 8:43 PM
                                                        Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/28 7:43 AM
                     Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - SpiveyDore 4/26 9:54 PM
                            Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/26 9:57 PM
                     Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/26 9:52 PM
                            Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - GoDores2005 4/27 12:10 PM
                                   Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/27 1:23 PM
                                          Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - GoDores2005 4/27 2:15 PM
                            Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - VUDORES99 4/26 10:03 PM
                                   Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/26 10:10 PM
                                          Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - VUDORES99 4/27 10:33 AM
                                                 Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - SpiveyDore 4/27 10:49 AM
                                                        Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - VUDORES99 4/27 4:01 PM
                                                               Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/27 5:35 PM
                                                                      Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - GoDores2005 4/28 7:16 PM
                                                                             Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/28 8:53 PM
                                                                                    Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - GoDores2005 4/30 2:21 PM
                                                                                           Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/30 5:20 PM
                                                        Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/27 11:47 AM
                                          Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/26 10:13 PM
                                                 Re: Employment lawyer response from CHris marve thread in war room. - Doreking 4/26 10:26 PM

What is your point? I believe that laws should be interpreted as written, to the best of a judge's ability. If unclear, the intent should be examined. If a judge is weighing policy pros and cons, he's probably not doing his job.

Posted on 4/30 5:20 PM | IP: Logged


Originally posted by Doreking:
It wasn't based on a law passed by Congress. It was based on its interpretation of the constitution as applied to action by the state.

The holding in plessy, as practiced, contradicted the letter of the constitution.

Google it if you don't believe it's judicial activism.

Posted on 4/30 2:21 PM | IP: Logged

Previous in Thread | Next in Thread | Back to Topics


Post New topic Post New Poll Post Reply Page 1

LATEST NEWS




Rivals.com is your source for: College Football | Football Recruiting | College Basketball | Basketball Recruiting | College Baseball | High School | College Merchandise
Site-specific editorial/photos © VandySports.com. All rights reserved. This website is an officially and independently operated source of news and information not affiliated with any school or team.
About | Advertise with Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | About our Ads | Terms of Service | Copyright/IP policy | Yahoo! Sports - NBC Sports Network

Statistical information ©2007 STATS LLC All Rights Reserved.